Hi, I looked at fixing percona-xtrabackup and noticed it is staticly linking to a bunch of libraries. These .a files are then removed in %install so they are not shipped. It bundles a bunch of this stuff from its extra/ dir: duktape googletest icu libcbor libedit libevent libfido2 libkmip lz4 protobuf rapidjson robin-hood-hashing zlib zstd On top of that, it pins boost to a specific (older!) version and bundles boost seperate via dist-git / sources :( I've just fixed it up in the same bad way, making it link to the old openssl just to get it past F35FailsToInstall for rhbz#1989019. It is going through rawhide and the branches now. But I think perhaps this package should be removed from rawhide. This package clearly breaks a lot of packaging rules, so I was wondering if there was ever any exception of some kind given to this package? I will definitely look at $dayjob migrating away from this, eg see if myhoard or mariabackup can be used instead. Any feedback would be appreciated, as it seems the maintainer is MIA. Paul _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
