Re: nspawn for rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 05:44, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Kevin Fenzi:

> Greetings everyone.
>
> Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
> issues and since then the fedoraproject koji has defaulted to using
> chroot isolation.
>
> Releng has had a ticket open for a long time to switch
> ( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6967 )
>
> I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices)
> have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide
> to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up.

What's the version of nspawn that will be used here?  Presumably it's
not the rawhide version, but the host version?

Currently I think all builders are Fedora 36. 

--
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux