Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Good catch, thanks. Fix is building.



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
------------------------------------------------ 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, August 18th, 2022 at 8:38 AM, Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> Regardless of the messy rebuild, thank you for working on libgda 6.0.
> 

> I think I was able to repair sequeler’s changelogs to the extent that
> they are linear and no pre-existing changelogs are lost. I suppose I
> could have edited out the entries for the builds that never succeeded,
> but I chose not to.
> 

> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sequeler/c/cd442978b013b374bd1a9127a9e42d8f2f5a1e34?branch=rawhide
> 

> However, the package still doesn’t build:
> 

> Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
> - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by
> libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64
> 

> In fact:
> 

> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local -i libgda5-devel
> […]
> 

> Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
> - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by
> libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64
> 

> It seems like the problem is here:
> 

> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libgda5/blob/rawhide/f/libgda5.spec#_73
> 

> Requires: %{upstream}%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> 

> where “upstream” is “libgda”.
> 

> On 8/18/22 09:10, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> 

> > Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :)
> > 

> > --
> > Gwyn Ciesla
> > she/her/hers
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > in your fear, seek only peace
> > in your fear, seek only love
> > -d. bowie
> > 

> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> > 

> > ------- Original Message -------
> > On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at 4:15 PM, Fabio Valentini decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 

> > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
> > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > 

> > > > I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga to 6.0.0.
> > > > 

> > > > The following packages are impacted.
> > > > 

> > > > If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with libgda5-devel.
> > > > 

> > > > anjuta
> > > > elementary-music
> > > > gtranslator
> > > > libgdamm
> > > > sequeler
> > > > Hi Gwyn,
> > > 

> > > I don't know which script you used for your rebuild attempts, but it
> > > looks like they are broken with packages that use rpmautospec:
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/40dbfe7c425e6e65fab03d00bc7ddfbb0befe0c6?branch=rawhide
> > > The changelog file should never be touched unless you want to amend
> > > wrong contents.
> > > 

> > > And now I guess I'll need to figure out how messed up the
> > > elementary-music changelog is because of this, and how to remove the
> > > superfluous "bump" and "revert bump" changelog messages) generated by
> > > the two follow-up commits ...
> > > 

> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/3636cbb68e2c6025d31d3e90cba776123feb0033?branch=rawhide
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/ca0771f290b80ebdf16dd225eab2047eeadad392?branch=rawhide
> > > 

> > > Please just fix your tools before you need to run your next scripted rebuilds :)
> > > 

> > > Fabio
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> > > 

> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> 

> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux