Re: CC0 reclassified as "not allowed" for code (reposted from legal list)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> I do not see why we need to give FDK-AAC a blanket pass just because a
> team at Red Hat decided to work on it first and send the licence for legal
> review afterwards (which is entirely the wrong order in which to do
> things).

PS: Especially now that Fedora ships a stripped FFmpeg, there is really no 
good reason to not do the stripping of encumbered parts of the AAC spec on 
the LGPL-licensed built-in FFmpeg AAC codec instead. That would also make it 
easier to switch to the unstripped FFmpeg AAC codec from RPM Fusion. (Right 
now, things like GStreamer use fdk-aac-free directly, not through FFmpeg, so 
switching to FFmpeg AAC is not a simple drop-in replacement.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux