Re: CC0 reclassified as "not allowed" for code (reposted from legal list)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Using that example, packagers wanting to
> continue to use CC0 would need to perform
> such a review, strip as needed, and need
> legal review?
> 
> Is that what you are suggesting?

That solution probably wouldn't make sense in typical cases involving CC0 covering code. However, I could imagine making package-specific determinations, possibly involving legal review in some cases, that particular uses of CC0 were tolerable,  based on the nature of what is actually covered by CC0. 

To give you a concrete example which is pretty clear: If I understand correctly, the REUSE initiative currently recommends, questionably in my view, that files assumed to be obviously noncopyrightable should be given a CC0 designation. [1] Given the kinds of files they have in mind, I could imagine giving packages an exemption from the prohibition on CC0 to the extent that such projects were merely attempting to be REUSE-conformant -- somewhat similar to Fedora's continued blanket tolerance of CC0 for nonsoftware "content". An example of such a package, gi-docgen, was raised in the Fedora legal gitlab issue thread on CC0. [2] That doesn't seem ideal to me. Of course a better solution would be for REUSE to not insist on CC0 as the license to use in this situation (or, even better, to drop the insistence on having a license notice on trivial-content files at all) (see [3]). 

[1] https://reuse.software/faq/#uncopyrightable
[2] https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/32#note_1045462752
[3 https://github.com/fsfe/reuse-docs/issues/62#issuecomment-1200305896

Richard
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux