Re: future of dual booting Windows and Fedora, redux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 1:34 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seems to me the only valid type code for a merged ESP+XBOOTLDR is ESP. What am I missing?

Right. I'd like to use the ESP type code for the merged ESP+XBOOTLDR so that the firmware will pick it up properly. The only problem is when using the bootctl command to initialize that partition (/boot), it requires that I set the SYSTEMD_RELAX_XBOOTLDR_CHECKS variable. I don't think it should require setting that environment variable in that case. But maybe I'm using the command incorrectly? The command I'm running is:

SYSTEMD_RELAX_XBOOTLDR_CHECKS=1 bootctl install --boot-path=/boot --esp-path=/boot

I think you have to set both "--boot-path" and "--esp-path" to the same value to get the merged partition. If I leave off "--boot-path", then I don't have to set the variable. But I'm not sure that it will configure everything correctly in that case. Will it?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux