Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

[Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dne 26. 07. 22 v 17:00 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 22:40:
> > On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
> > > > Dear maintainers.
> > > >
> > > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the 
> > > > following packages
> > > > will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before 
> > > > branching (August 2022).
> > > >
> > > > Policy: 
> > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
> > > >
> > > > The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since 
> > > > Fedora 35.
> > > >
> > > > This report is based on dist tags.
> > > >
> > > > Packages collected via:
> > > > https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If you see a package that was built, please let me know.
> > > > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, 
> > > > please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval 
> > > > for that.
> > > >
> > > > If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so.
> > > >
> > > >           Package                       (co)maintainers
> > > > ========================================================================= 
> > > >
> > > > rubygem-sprockets-rails              jaruga, pvalena, 
> > > > ruby-packagers-sig
> > > >
> > > > Depending on: rubygem-sprockets-rails (22)
> > > >      rubygem-actionmailbox (maintained by: pvalena)
> > > >          rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires 
> > > > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> > > >
> > > >      rubygem-activestorage (maintained by: ruby-packagers-sig, 
> > > > vondruch)
> > > >          rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src requires 
> > > > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> > > >
> > > >      rubygem-railties (maintained by: mmorsi, pvalena, tdawson, 
> > > > vondruch)
> > > >          rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src requires 
> > > > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> > > >
> > > >      rubygem-sassc-rails (maintained by: pvalena)
> > > >          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch requires 
> > > > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> > > >          rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src requires 
> > > > rubygem(sprockets-rails) = 3.2.2
> > > > ...
> > >
> > > Can you show what changed for rubygem-sprockets-rails compared with
> > > the previous report one week ago?
> > >
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/BEYCREMETV6DDVFMLKOE5HR2XWEWBPFE/ 
> > >
> > >
> > > The above report seems to be saying that no package depends on 
> > > rubygem-sprockets-rails,
> > > but this time many packages depend on rubygem-sprockets-rails.
> >
> > Only 4 packages directly require rubygem(sprockets-rails):
> >
> > rubygem-actionmailbox
> >      rubygem-actionmailbox-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
> >
> > rubygem-activestorage
> >      rubygem-activestorage-7.0.2.3-1.fc37.src
> >
> > rubygem-railties
> >      rubygem-railties-7.0.2.3-2.fc37.src
> >
> > rubygem-sassc-rails
> >      rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.noarch
> >      rubygem-sassc-rails-2.1.2-4.fc36.src
> >
> >
> > I've checked and from the spec files, it seems that they always did.
> >
> > I've repoqueried this compose 
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20220719.n.0/ 
> > and it seems that the requirements were there.
> >
> > The only difference, it seems, is that rubygem-image_processing was 
> > part of the FTBFS packages set before and its dep tree already 
> > included those packages, so the script decided not to report them 
> > twice :(
> >
> > https://pagure.io/releng/blob/c9a08daa74/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py#_419 
> >
> >
> > When I remove this thing, and re-add rubygem-image_processing to the 
> > list of FTBFS packages, I see rubygem-sprockets-rails's dependencies 
> > reported.
> >
> > I guess we should fix the script, this is dangerous.
> >
> > And if you think this justifies not retiring rubygem-sprockets-rails 
> > this round, I am OK with that.
> >
> > Thanks for spotting this. No other remaining packages here seem to be 
> > affected by this now.
>
> Okay, thank you for confirmation.
>
> Anyway now I checked the upstream repo and the upstream already fixed 
> build issue.
> So I've backported the upstream fix and now build was successful as
> rubygem-sprockets-rails-3.2.2-6.fc37 .
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2036386


Thx a lot for fixing those. I appreciate that.


Vít


> Regards,
> Mamoru
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure