On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 05:07:39AM +0200, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Chris Murphy wrote: > > cryptsetup does have Bitlocker support, so long as you have the recovery > > key you can unlock and get access to your data, I've tested this. > > But you need a recovery key to begin with, because the main key is sealed in > the TPM and not visible from anything other than Windows. > > So Bitlocker essentially forces Windows on you. Bitlocker is part of Windows. Sure, cryptsetup supports it, but if you are using cryptsetup already maybe stick with LUKS2? > > This is entirely beside the point though, which is to try and make dual > > boot as useful for users as possible. We want users to be confident about > > both OS's remain accessible in a discoverable way, without having to jump > > through hoops. > > Sure. Really sad though that we have to work around a broken piece of > "security" software that effectively functions like a ransomware. > > Where is the outcry about this misfeature? Not here, thankfully. This is fedora-devel, I consider name-calling other operating systems to be offtopic here. -- Tomasz Torcz “(…) today's high-end is tomorrow's embedded processor.” tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx — Mitchell Blank on LKML _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
