Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On ۱۴۰۱/۵/۳ ۴:۵۴ قبل‌ازظهر, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
<...>

Use (Close: rhbz#1438205) instead of (rhbz#1438205)
or Closes: rhbz#1438205, Fix: rhbz#1438205, Fixes: rhbz#1438205
to automatically close the related nug

Thanks for the tip.


On 7/24/22 19:14, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On 22/07/24 06:05PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> If ODE 0.16 was only built as part of the mass rebuild and wasn't
>> available in the buildroot during the mass rebuild (and I don't think
>> it was), then all the other packages that depend on it were still
>> built against the older ODE 0.14 version as part of the mass rebuild.
>> Once the mass rebuild is merged back into f37 then all other packages
>> that depend on ODE are going to have broken dependencies.
>
> That indeed appears to be the case. The f37-rebuild build target[1]
> builds against f37-build but tags completed builds into f37-rebuild.
> ode-0.16.2-2.fc37[2] is only tagged into f37-rebuild.
>
> [1]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=24581
> [2]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016899
>
> Also, looking at ompl, one of ode's dependents, you can see that it was
> rebuilt against the old version of ode:
>
>> DEBUG util.py:445:   ode-devel                              x86_64  0.14-15.fc36        build   66 k
>
> -- https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ompl/1.5.0/11.fc37/data/logs/x86_64/root.log and
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016925https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016925
>
> In order to fix this, a provenpackager will need to build all of the
> dependents in a sidetag like normal. Preferably, this could happen
> before the mass rebuild tag is merged back into f37. I am a bit busy
> today, but I suppose I could do this later if nobody beats me to it.
>

It is done: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-26df2fedba

Had to fixup freewrl though, the java thing on i686.

Thanks a lot for fixing this. And sorry for the trouble.


Thanks,

Hedayat





Best regards,

Robert-André
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux