Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio Valentini wrote:
> It would be entirely possible to mark the package as deprecated, but
> also give it to new maintainers.

Why not leave the decision to the new maintainers then?

I do not see a good reason to prevent adding software depending on pcre (1) 
as long as somebody maintains pcre (1) in Fedora and is willing to apply 
security patches when needed.

Considering that it is far from a drop-in replacement, whether to move a 
dependent package to pcre2 is ultimately an upstream decision, not a Fedora 
one. Hence, declaring pcre (1) off-limits means that maintainers can be 
effectively blocked by policy from importing upstream software that is not 
yet packaged in Fedora.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux