Re: Comaintainer(s) wanted for qt5-qtwebengine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I presume it uses a sandboxed multiprocess architecture anyway, like
> upstream Chromium. Is it not true?
>
> If so, it's surely one of the most secure packages we have in Fedora.
> Of course, that's no good excuse to fall behind on security updates.
> But I have high confidence in Chromium's sandbox.

It is true. QtWebEngine uses the Chromium seccomp sandbox. (I can definitely 
confirm that because bugs in the sandbox policy, such as incompatibilities 
with newer glibc versions, immediately manifest in some or all web pages 
completely failing to render. I have had to fix a couple of these. So 
seccomp is definitely used.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux