Re: Comaintainer(s) wanted for qt5-qtwebengine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/07/2022 08:55, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
I also wonder if some features of QtWebEngine, such as the V8 JIT
compiler or even scripting as a whole, ought to be proactively
disabled.

QtWebEngine is an extremely vulnerable thing due to a major lag after WebKit/Blink security patches. I even decided to build Psi+ client without WebEngine support.

But QtWebEngine is also used by GNOME/KDE web browsers (Epiphany, Falcon). Their users won't be happy after disabling JS engine.

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vitaly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux