Re: F37 proposal: SELinux Parallel Autorelabel (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On July 15, 2022 9:42:35 PM UTC, Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SELinux_Parallel_Autorelabel
>
>This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
>community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved
>by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.
>
>
>== Summary ==
>After a system's SELinux mode is switched from disabled to enabled, or
>after an administrator runs `fixfiles onboot`, SELinux autorelabel
>will be run in parallel by default.
>
>== Owner ==
>* Name: [[User:plautrba| Petr Lautrbach]]
>* Email: plautrba@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>== Detailed Description ==
>SELinux tools `restorecon` and `fixfiles` recently gained the ability
>to relabel files in parallel using the `-T nthreads` option. This
>option is currently not used in the automatic relabel after reboot.
>When users want/need the parallel relabeling they have to specify the
>option explicitly (e.g. `fixfiles -T 0 onboot`). With this change `-T
>0` (0 == use all available CPU cores) will be the default for
>`fixfiles onboot` and users will have to use `fixfiles -T 1 onboot` to
>force it to use only one thread.
>
>The rationale is that when autorelabel runs, there are no other
>resource-intensive processes running on the system, so it's fine (and
>actually better) to use all available parallelism to speed up the task
>and get to a fully booted system faster.
>
>
>== Benefit to Fedora ==
>Faster reboot after switching back to an SELinux enabled system or
>when triggering autorelabel explicitly.

Just out of curiosity, how large is the speedup typically?

>
>== Scope ==
>* Proposal owners:
>** Update `/usr/libexec/selinux/selinux-autorelabel` to use `-T 0` by default.
>
>* Other developers:
>* Release engineering:
>* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
>* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
>* Alignment with Objectives:
>
>
>== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
>
>
>== How To Test ==
># boot with SELinux disabled - add `selinux=0` to the kernel command line
># reboot
># store the time it took
># run `fixfiles -T 1 onboot`
># reboot
># the latter reboot should take longer time
>
>
>== User Experience ==
>Systems should be up and running faster after SELinux autorelabel.
>
>== Dependencies ==
>
>
>== Contingency Plan ==
>* Contingency mechanism: (What to do?  Who will do it?) N/A (not a
>System Wide Change)
>* Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), Yes/No
>
>== Documentation ==
>
>N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux