My investigations shown, probably nothing will be affected by removal of jdk on i686 and the fix in subversion and automake/autotools is fluid and, again, will damage nothing. However I'm not sure. I can not possibly see into all details of
all affected packages.
Where casual pkg which is being depndent by nothing, may simply get weird FTBFS, but not a package, on which half of the system depend.
File a bug against subversion, put it on the release blocker tracker, and do
not waste everyone else's time.
Thus saying, is it really waste of time? I really doubt. It is making people aware of quite major happening, and thus about fact, that they may be affected, even if they did not know. Maybe "the script that generated this data and filed
bugs for
packages affected by the removal of Java packages on i686 was a bit over-zealous." ( to quote :) ) but I still somehow finds it correct.
A HEADS UP email to this list makes people aware. Dozens of bugs that
I was very very strict with what packages to spam with bugs. And from half of distro indirectly affected, I took vonly the most severe subset.
will be closed without action is not helpful though.
I'm really not sure If I Agree. The email here was dropped 3times. I guess you noticed the replying people are very very small subset of the packagers. But I agree the people wathing bugzilla are probably the same, And those not readinf
devel, are not reading the bugzilla either.
Jiri, could you please close all the bugzillas that were only opened due to the subversion<-java dependency now when https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103909 was fixed?
I've closed some bugs for very important components manualy, but there are simply too many.
Argh:( You should have not. I'm really reluctant to do so. How can you proof the package is really not affected by the change?
I had walked through the filled bugs, and I closed one. Qite a few form the list Miro closed should brobably be reopened. Only really few pkgs depends on java only through subversion. Tehy are usually puling java also other pkgs.
I admit I had maybe messed up subpkgs output (not the detection), but I would heavily vote to not close the bugs without deeper understanding.
J.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
