Re: Shall we add a limit to number of packages in a Bodhi update?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2022-07-13 at 19:49 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 7:32 PM Maxwell G via devel
> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On 22/07/13 08:58AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > It's also where we usually route *manual* testing feedback. If people
> > > can't comment and karma a Bodhi update, where can they test this big
> > > and very-potentially-destabilizing change?
> > 
> > The go rebuilds in question are not very destabilizing, and they don't
> > have breaking changes. The packages are simply getting rebuilt against
> > the new go minor version with fixes for the CVE(s). I've already had to
> > waive the tests, as they timed out when trying to download the 300+
> > packages in the update.
> 
> I wonder if it would have made sense to have submitted those 300+
> builds in separate bodhi updates (at least in several smaller batches,
> if not individually)?
> At least in this case, that would've been a little bit more work, but
> would have caused less of a chance to break bodhi.
> As far as I can tell, there's no reason the builds need to be handled
> together, as the only thing that ties these builds together is the
> *reason* why they were rebuilt, but they don't necessary need to be
> pushed to testing or stable as a single unit.

If they need to be rebuilt for an API/ABI change, then by policy they
should be grouped together. We do not want a situation where the
API/ABI change gets pushed stable but some of the rebuilds do not, or
vice versa.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux