On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:43, Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 12:25, Iñaki Ucar <iucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 18:13, Robbie Harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > Maxwell G via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > >> > > I believe Miro uses this for the FTI bugs. It tends to be more accurate, >> > > especially when there hasn't been a compose for a couple days. If this >> > > is something people are interested in, I think it's worthwhile to >> > > include this repo definition in fedora-packager. >> > >> > An authoritative, preferably single, simple command to run to answer the >> > question "across all architectures, what needs my package and in what >> > form?" would be really helpful. Even if there's a "correct" way to do >> > it today, it's not discoverable (as evidenced by these threads) nor is >> > it easy to remember. Something like `dnf whatuses src:mypackage` (or of >> > similar simplicity) would be appreciated. >> >> If this functionality requires defining and enabling additional repos, >> maybe dnf is not the proper place? But then maybe fedpkg is. Anyway, I >> agree that a simple command would be very much appreciated. >> > > fedpkg would only call dnf to try and get the same information. It doesn't have any better window on things It could e.g. package the necessary "development" repos and activate them when calling dnf. -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
