> My comment was specifically about sysprof. I've been told that the > GNOME developers will not even consider anything else. This means that > we need to fix sysprof. If we do that, it will be possible to use GNOME > OS for profiling on older CPUs, and hardware-assisted backtraces on > newer CPUs on Fedora (at least Skylake and Zen 3, especially once we've > got userspace SHSTK support). As the maintainer of sysprof, trust me when I say that I'd be thrilled if GNOME used something else so it's one less thing to maintain. But the conjoining of data really is the value proposition which has kept it alive. > * Enhance sysprof with LBR and SHSTK support. Agreed that regardless of this proposal, I'd be happy to see support for addition data recording features in Sysprof. I've filed https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/sysprof/-/issues/77 to track it and would appreciate any comments you can leave about how/what that would entail. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
