On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 3:33 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 30/06/2022 17:23, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > I do not expect Fedora Legal will likely come onto a public mailing list to debate liability with you. Hopefully it should be obvious why that's not a good idea. There's nothing more I can do except link you back to Matthew's post. Sorry. > > These are double standards. I don't why they hate RPM Fusion. > > Fedora is a public, community-driven distribution, so they must post an > official response to our request. No, they do not, really. Community driven does not (never has) meant that the community has the final decision on everything. If you do not understand this, talk to *your* lawyer (only your lawyer is responsible to you) and have them explain the details and distinctions and reasonings to you. Whether the RH lawyers recommendations in this case are good or not, or whether anyone agrees or not, is, ultimately, not really relevant. Gary _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
