> Users of RPM-based variants will expect the default package manager to install RPMs, > not Flatpaks, or they would have chosen a Flatpak-based variant. Agree on that one. That being said, what about allowing users to set this preference by themselves? I also think that the repository information should also be made more visible; if a package is available from multiple sources, gnome-software will display a separate search entry for each of those, which looks very odd from a UX perspective - I'd expect some kind of match-by-id to be performed and for duplicated packages to either be merged into a single button, or to have some additional bit of text on them telling me which one comes from where. Btw, shouldn't gnome-sofware pull in PackageKit? I typically only use dnf, so I installed gnome-software and it was unusable until I manually installed PackageKit as well. A.FI. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
