Re: F37 Change Proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> However, I believe Flatpaks built from Fedora RPMs should take
> precedence over Flatpaks built from Flathub. Flathub should only be
> preferred when there is no Fedora Flatpak available.

That is not a solution, because Fedora Flatpaks are effectively an abandoned 
feature, as evidenced by the next thread, which points out that a required 
tool was removed from the repository more than 6 months ago.

We need Fedora RPMs to take precedence over Flatpaks built from Flathub, not 
just Flatpaks built from Fedora RPMs.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux