Re: Stalled EPEL Request Policy (was Unresponsive maintainer: Alex Chernyakhovsky)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 1:24:07 PM CDT Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 1:09:07 PM CDT Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > Newly added EPEL maintainers can make any changes to Fedora branches. I
> > don't like that.
> 
> I'm a bit confused. You say this sounds like a "package hijack attempt," but
> then you also say you don't like that it only allows access to epel*
> branches.
Ah, I misread "can make any changes" as "can't make any changes," as 
maintainers added through this process are only given collaborator access to 
epel* branches. That explains why I was confused...

-- 
Thanks,

Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux