On 6/27/22 04:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > Re variant 2: the proposal limited to brige/bond devices seems much more > reasonable. In particular, the case described below of a server (virtualized > or not) in a big datacenter is the one case where the benefits of > MACAddressPolicy=none are clearly visible. I still don't think it's worth > changing the default, but here the cost:benefit ratio is much closer. I think that's reasonable. The proposal owners are willing to make this change to the proposal so that it only applies to bond/bridge/team devices if that is more acceptable. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
