On 23. 06. 22 19:58, Maxwell G wrote:
Jun 23, 2022 12:14:26 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Alrighty, in that case:
$ comm -23 <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires openssl1.1-devel | grep src$ | sort) <(repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires openssl-devel | grep src$ | sort)
botan2-0:2.19.1-2.fc37.src
erlang-0:24.3.4.1-1.fc37.src
chatty-0:0.6.3-1.fc37.src
mumble-0:1.3.4-8.fc36.src
pypy-0:7.3.9-1.fc37.src
pypy3.7-0:7.3.9-1.3.7.fc37.src
pypy3.8-0:7.3.9-1.3.8.fc37.src
python-uamqp-0:1.5.3-2.fc37.src
python2.7-0:2.7.18-22.fc37.src
python3.6-0:3.6.15-9.fc37.src
python3.7-0:3.7.13-2.fc37.src
Perhaps it makes sense to query recursively to get a fuller picture? All the recursive dependents would also break if their dependencies FTBFS and get retired.
That's complicated. Those are source packages and they build various binary
packages -- we would need to query those. Scripts and web applications are
build around that, but the results are imperfect. This is the best I can get
with a "simple" query:
$ repoquery -q --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires openssl1.1 --recursive
...2526 lines...
But that does not take BuildRequires of BuildRequires into account.
And I have verified openssl1.1 does not provide anything shared with
openssl(-libs).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
