Re: F37 proposal: Deprecate openssl1.1 package (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/22/22 15:05, Vipul Siddharth wrote:
== Benefit to Fedora ==
This proposal ensures than no new packages in Fedora will rely on the
deprecated OpenSSL version that will cause an overall increase of
security/stability, and will reduce the amount of old packages relying
on OpenSSL 1.1 series.

This sentence is too long, and as a result I don't think readers will understand it the way it was intended. I suggest simplifying to:

---

This proposal ensures that no new packages in Fedora will rely on the deprecated OpenSSL version.  That  change will cause an overall increase in security/stability, and will reduce the amount of old packages relying on OpenSSL 1.1 series.

---

In addition to the wording changes, do you mean 'package-versions' here where you say 'packages'? Is a new version of OpenSSH, for example, considered a 'new package' for the purposes of this proposal?

--
Kevin P. Fleming
He/Him/His
Principal Program Manager, RHEL
Red Hat US/Eastern Time Zone
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux