Re: F37 proposal: Supplement of Server distributables by a KVM VM disk image (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 8:19 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm definitely in favor, but a couple of questions...
>
> What format image is to be produced? qcow2? or raw.xz? or something
> else?
>
> I assume this will not be release blocking at least at first?
>

If it's for regular KVM, I assume qcow2. The only reason Fedora Cloud
images are raw instead of qcow2 is because cloud providers are bad at
handling QEMU's native format. I know if it were my choice, I wouldn't
ship raw images for Fedora Cloud. Too big and annoying to deal with.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux