Am 18.06.22 um 13:05 schrieb Aleksandra Fedorova:
Hi, all,
I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM.
As one of the key points is to turn it into a common standard for rpm
packages across the ecosystem, the conversation is currently opened
upstream [1] and in RHEL Engineering. And I'd like to get Fedora
community on board.
This is not a finalized proposal and I think it is not ready yet to be
a Fedora Change.
But I want to start a conversation and ask for opinions. There are
also some open questions which need help, especially the requirements
around build reason. And alternative suggestions are welcome as well.
I've posted long version at
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/rfc-build-tag-in-rpms/39954
You can comment there (simply login with your FAS id) or here on the
mailing list.
And I am going to update that post with the new feedback.
Shorter version:
================================================
We'd like to introduce Build Number/Tag/Id in the rpm metadata.
I am strongly opposed to this proposal.
It is just useless featuritis and doesn't make any sense at all, breaks
lots of tools/scripts, breaks 3rd party packaging conventions, and many
more ...
Ralf
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
