Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Do you really need more than five or so *physical* stack frames during
profiling, to figure out what is going on?  Graphs generated from DWARF
unwinding typically will show logical stack frames from inlining, too,
and appear much deeper.

Yes, more than a couple times per year I encounter cases that require
10 to 12 physical stack frames in order to understand what is happening.
The current (deepest) level can more than 5 or so frames from the nearest
level that has meaning for the application programmer.  This happens
particularly often in Boost, other C++ object-oriented programming
(std::string and relatives have several physical levels that tend to
obscure) and python (or any interpreter with a deeply-recursive
implementation.)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux