On Sun, 2022-06-12 at 01:27 +0200, Petr Menšík wrote: > Because of attitude documented in change for systemd-resolved [1], I > expect the only change to get this improved would be switch from > systemd-resolved to anything more DNSSEC friendly. I don't understand > why, but it seems systemd team is avoiding working DNSSEC as much as > they can. Yet it was fixed ALMOST after change related to original issue > #4621 [2], reported 4 years before even the original change in Fedora > were started. > > I will attempt to prepare a better working alternative for the next > release or the one after it. > > 1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/systemd-resolved#DNSSEC > 2. https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/4621 Well, that's from quite some time ago. And you have an active thread about this on devel@ where systemd developers seem to be working with you to get your PRs merged. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
