On Sat, Jun 4 2022 at 04:07:09 AM +0200, Petr Menšík
<pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Do we have any list of significant applications, which use
/etc/resolv.conf only? It is used by most of DNS related tools I
manage.
dig and host use dns only. Sure, they would not be able to report
split-DNS required hosts correctly. But browsers tend to use
getaddrinfo() glibc calls AFAIK. Can you name some important?
No, I have no clue. But I'm pretty sure applications that do choose to
use /etc/resolv.conf still deserve to receive correct results.
On Sat, Jun 4 2022 at 04:07:09 AM +0200, Petr Menšík
<pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, I had not reopened that bug only because it were slight
improvement. But I wanted it working in default configuration, which
is
requested explicitly:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945309
You and I have exchanged few comments, but maintainers never wrote a
single line. What I would have a tracker for, when those bugs don't
receive a single comment after 6 months? I don't keep bitting by
resolved only because I always disable it ASAP on my machines. I
report
every issue I find, but very little of them have any progress.
I see Lennart responded in the upstream bug:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/19227
although it's still waiting on him after a long time.
This is an upstream issue, not a downstream issue, so I wouldn't expect
much interaction in the downstream bug report.
Michael
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
