On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 10:36 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 10:26 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 04:11 -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 01:41:06PM +0530, divij bhatt wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > How would i know that my glibc is nptl enabled. > > > > > > getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION > > > > How about cross-building? > > Any preprocessor define or symbol from glibc to check for by > > autoconf-magic? > > why? > If your program code cares I think you're doing something wrong :) Agreed, but ... > (especially since you could well end up building against linuxthreads > but running against nptl, as fedora core 3 and prior did) ... did you ever try to write a portable pthreaded program? I did, and found myself in a forest of wildest autoconf checks, because the pthread API and pthread run-time behaving varies quite largely between OSes and pthread implementations. Now, I am wondering what might have changed on Linux and which pitfalls might have been introduced ... Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
