Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 25. 05. 22 v 14:38 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 07:27:51AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> said:
The follow up suggested that the license
field be differently formatted.

I disagree with such explanatory
prefixes, as it requires yet more apps
to parse/support various prefixes.
No, my suggestion of using "License: SPDX:<foo>"


It was already suggested elsewhere to use e.g.:


~~~

License: %{spdx <foo>}

~~~


That would have additional benefit, that we could check right away if the license field contains valid licenses. While rpmlint/rpminspect can certainly do so, why not do it earlier?


Vít


  would not require any
additional changes.  Anything that cares about the License field will
already need changes to recongize the SPDX values; this would just
remove any ambiguity.  And as very little parses the License field, so
there's not some big effort to update required in any case.
Yes, the value of using SPDX is that it is an unambigious machine
parseable format. If we don't have a way to determine whether a
given Fedora specfile is using SPDX or legacy names, then we
diminish the value of performing the change, because we remain
ambiguous.

So using this suggestion of 'License: SPDX:<foo>' will be useful
both for apps that are querying RPMs at runtime, and for ourselves
as maintainers to know when all packages in rawhide have finished
being converted by their maintainers and/or provenpackagers.

With regards,
Daniel

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux