Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 25. 05. 22 v 6:28 Gary Buhrmaster napsal(a):
I interpreted the proposal as adding a
new stanza SPDX: in addition to License:
which requires changing the definition

Nope. No new tag. We will use the old License tag.

Just instead of

  License: $short_name

will be

  License: $spdx

And rpm itself does not evaluate the string. So no backporting is needed.

Miroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux