Re: SPDX identifiers in old branches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:29 PM Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Would it make sense to make ALL the new tags be SPDX:<tag>, at least for
> > an interim period (of years most likely) where both old and new tags are
> > allowed?
> 
> I don't think that is going to work unless the rpm spec
> file support would be backported to previous releases
> (without another macro that tries to do some magic).
> And the goal for some of us is to have one spec file
> work across all currently supported releases.

I'm not talking about a new tag or format, just literally making the
License: tag be "SPDX:<foo>".
-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux