(apparently the <package>-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mails don't work anymore?)
On 22.05.22 20:57, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
Some time ago I've started working on updating to scotch-7.x, with
some initial test builds here [1]. To finalize the update, I'd like to
gather some opinions (potentially affected maintainers in CC):
- Should metis get retired? Scotch has a scotchmetis compatibility
library which is advertised as a faster drop-in replacement for metis,
and indeed ships a metis.h which would conflict with the one from the
original metis package.
- Should I be adding 64-bit index builds for i686? There is a metis64
package, but since i686 is expected to go away soonish, is it worth
the effort? This is of interest to petsc which currently BRs
metis64-devel.
Side note: I don't really recall how I ended up maintaining scotch,
but if someone who is actively using the package is willing to step up
and (co-)maintain it, please let me know!
Thanks
Sandro
[1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/scotch-7.0.0
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure