Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
The issue is that in %prep, %buildsubdir is not defined, so the definition of %_package_note_file, which uses %buildsubdir, has a different value than in %build and later. Generally the best solution is to move the step that tries to make use of the package notes file in %prep to %build.But looking at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/courier- unicode/blob/rawhide/f/courier-unicode.spec,
I see that in this one, %configure gets invoked from %build.
I don't see anything in %prep that'd cause an issue. Can you post the spec file that is causing problems?
But in mine's %configure gets invoked in %prep instead:https://github.com/svarshavchik/courier-libs/blob/master/unicode/courier- unicode.spec.in
I guess I'll move this one to %build as well. I tried searching for some current documentation, and all the examples I found also invoked %configure from %build.
My recollection was that early rpm packaging documentation was otherwise, in the context of using --short-circuit. That is, the tutorials were: get the configure options right, then use -bb --short-circuit to get your make to succeed, you've already taken care of ./configure in the %setup step.
Attachment:
pgprnr19xYgwq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
