Hi, "jiri vanek" <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > As for .NET - you can not compare. That's completely fair. One (OpenJDK) has been open source in various forms for 15 years. The other has been (re-designed and made) open source for around 5 years now. 10 years is an eternity, and has both positive and negative implications for the late-comer. So there are definitely going to be huge differences, in terms of ownership models, community contributions, availability, usage, how the ecosystem works and user experience. > The pure fact that you can dnf install it says nothing about what lies > beneath and how to properly toolchain it or package applications for > it. I had seenboth .NET packagin internals, and tried to pack and .NET > application and it was terrible. But yes, presentation is good. Could you share more? Are your concerns around the .NET SDK/Runtime packages themselves or packaging external applications that need to be built using the SDK/Runtime? What would make you revise your opinion? Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: B157A9F0 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) Fingerprint = 9DB5 2F0B FD3E C239 E108 E7BD DF99 7AF8 B157 A9F0 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
