On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 10:06:44 AM CDT Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do we need to %if-%else it in the spec file? I recall some discussion about this on the legal list, but I see no > > guidelines proposed here. > > If you maintain one spec for all branches then you will need %if-%else. And yes, it works. > If that ends up being the policy, it would be nice if there was a convenience macro that was set to 1 on branches that allow SPDX identifiers. Also, are we going to have some way of marking which packages have been converted and which haven't? This will be a problem with `MIT` licensed specfiles, for instance, because the license identifier means something different in Fedora land than it does in SPDX. > * Convert license string to SPDX formula: > $ license-fedora2spdx 'MIT or GPLv1' > > Warning: more options how to interpret MIT. Possible options: > ['Adobe-Glyph', 'MIT-CMU', 'MIT-CMU', 'HPND', 'HPND', 'no-spdx-yet > (MIT license (also X11))', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SGI-B-2.0', 'SMLNJ', > 'MIT-enna', 'MIT-feh', 'mpich2'] > > mpich2 or GPL-1.0-only -- Thanks, Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
