On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 12:26 +0000, Artem Tim wrote: > It works for me and really like this new approach. Switched couple of > my packages and no issue so far with rpmautospec itself. But some > 3rd-party tools requires some work and adaption. For example if you > already switched to rpmautospec format and try to: > > $ fedpkg import foo.fc36.src.rpm > > then your changlog file will be removed: > > Removing no longer used file: changelog I haven't seen the SRPM in question but have a hunch what happens – assuming you created the SRPM using `fedpkg srpm`, then attempted to import it into the same package repository. If that's the case, then this is – while unintuitive – “working as designed”: Running `fedpkg srpm` makes a SRPM which is buildable by plain RPM (no need for rpmautospec) out of the spec file, patches, etc. This adds a header to the spec file and replaces %autorelease/%autochangelog so they expand to their final values and doesn't contain the changelog file (which would be useless at this point)… and this is what gets imported into the repository _replacing_ all the files already in there (including `changelog`). Makes sense? Nils -- Nils Philippsen / Senior Software Engineer / Red Hat PGP fingerprint: D0C1 1576 CDA6 5B6E BBAE 95B2 7D53 7FCA E9F6 395D _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
