V Tue, May 10, 2022 at 08:23:17AM -0000, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a): > > I somehow don't understand why there should be anything like "unused > > source files". Why is something like this even possible? > 1. Grab a package > 2. Edit the spec file in a way that changes which sources are used (say, update to a new version) > 3. Do not run "fedpkg new-sources" to upload the new tarballs > 4. The "sources" file now lists files that are not actually used by the spec Here I do these two additional steps: 4.1. Review thew new sources for new licenses, usually by comparing them to the old sources. 4.2. Run "fedpkg new-sources" because now I know the sources are license-acceptable and because it prevents me from forgetting to run "fedpkg new-sources" before pushing commits to dist-git. > 5. Run "fedpkg mockbuild" > 6. Mockbuild attempts to download package sources > Here I do rsync to a virtual machine and "fedpkg local" there. But I guess it does not differ much from "fedpkg mockbuild". -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure