Sérgio Basto kirjoitti 8.5.2022 klo 7.52:
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 21:45 +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
Author of the patch under discussion here.
The premise was that "specfile sources" equal "sources file sources".
Since there is a request like this, that is apparently not always the
case.
Hi,
Again where is the request ? I'd like to see a bit better why it is
needed and if we really need that.
But if he want download sources that aren't use in spec file, I prefer
opt-in in sources :
fedpkg sources --force
Just to be clear, all I know about the request is what has been said in
this thread. Also I would be interested in more details, what is being
stored in the lookaside cache and why it cannot/should not be listed as
Source or Patch in the specfile?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
