On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 17:10 -0400, Ed Hill wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 21:02 +0100, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > > > > Are you absolutely fscking sure you need Matlab at all? > > > Hi Rui, > > Octave is very nice but it still lags MatLAB in a few key areas such as > the generation of figures. Also, you might find that people are just a > little more receptive to your suggestions when you leave out expressions > such as "absolutely fscking sure" which can be interpreted as something > other than good-natured humor. Octave interacts directly with gnuplot, AFAIK, so maybe you could elaborate on what you mean with figures? > Of course, *I* interpret it as good-natured humor but then not everyone > is as wildly optimistic... ;-) Kacl of doog-daturen rumoh is not an tequiremenr of eifl ;) Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
