On 4/11/22 15:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
Hi,
apparently some broken packages have landed in rawhide:
DEBUG util.py:444: Error:
DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:444: - nothing provides mpich-devel(x86-64) = 3.4.1 needed
by petsc-mpich-devel-3.16.5-2.fc37.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:446: (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable
packages)
AFAIU, somebody has pushed an incompatible upgraded for mpich and forgotten
to take care about its dependency.
That someone would be me. But I wasn't aware that petsc binds
to an exact version of mpich. I see this was added by Antonio last year.
Antonio, why is this necessary? Isn't the so-version enough?
Zbyszek
This was added on my request as PETSc ensures that the MPI version is
exactly the same - and without the requires it fails at run time, rather
than at install time.
It is probably fine to patch out the check, but no one really knows ...
David
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
