On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 08:49 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 14:12 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 07:24 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:24 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 23:02 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > > > These are a side effect of a bug somewhere [1]: > > > > > /usr/bin/stVv16b0 > > > > > /usr/bin/stdTtJd1 > > > > > /usr/bin/stnIJwI1 > > > > > /usr/bin/stxfFoJZ > > > > > > It looks like a bug in strip whereby it doesn't remove the temporary > > > file if it doesn't recognize the file format. > > Sounds plausible to me. If this holds, the origin of these files > > probably is brp-strip-*, because it blindly runs strip rsp. > > "<target>-strip" on all binaries and doesn't distinguish between foreign > > and native binaries. > > > > A straight forward work-around would be to hard-code the directories > > containing native/foreign binaries into brp-*. > > Or to patch binutils to not leave its junk lying around. s/Or/And/ These actually are 2 independent issues. brp-*'s deficiencies trigger a bug in binutils. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
