Hi
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 5:33 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
I don't think we should characterize the Changes process in this way. Fedora
is a place for experimentation, and if a proposal is rejected, it is totally
appropriate to adjust that proposal based on feedback and re-submit.
Partly, I think this confusion is because the change process doesn't differentiate at the status or summary level between rejected: we don't think this is ever going to happen vs rejected: this looks like a good idea but the timeline doesn't look great, break it down and go slower vs rejected: we don't think this is fully baked yet or we want to get some more clarity, come back after you have the answers.
Rahul
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
