Re: Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 10:12 AM Kamil Dudka <kdudka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thursday, April 7, 2022 3:45:45 PM CEST Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > Sorry for keeping asking naive questions, but is there a chance to do
> > > some mass rebuild prior this lands, to asses the impact? Better to avoid
> > > (complete?) breakage of ELN and give change to fix the (most
> > > outstanding) issues prior it lands.
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure what benefit that would have. The crypto policies are
> > generally applied at runtime, not build-time.
>
> The policies applied at run time can break builds though, especially when
> they include regression tests that use crypto.

Ah, that hadn't occurred to me. I'm still not sure it's worth running
a mass-rebuild specifically for this, though. I think it might be
better to clean things up as they come up and then piggy-back on the
next Fedora mass-rebuild.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux