Adam Williamson wrote:
> In point of fact, no. Nobody can. It needs either more positive karma
> or two more days in testing, under the policy. As I said, the automated
> test failure is irrelevant to this.
Actually, this is not a critical path package (or the minimum timeout would
be 2 weeks, not 1), so the stable threshold could be lowered to 1, then the
update can be pushed.
In fact, I think I could even technically do that (both lower the threshold
and queue the package for stable) as a provenpackager, but I do not want to
overrule the maintainer.
That said, I am still not convinced that it is a good idea that critical
security updates (and other urgent updates, such as, e.g., regression fixes)
cannot be pushed directly to stable without any karma requirement at all as
was the case a (sadly) long time ago. (I have been trying without success to
get this decision overturned ever since.)
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
