Re: Please use side tags for backwards-incompatible bumps of major packages, not buildroot overrides

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



V Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:40:28PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a):
> So, now that we have side-tags to perform this kind of builds, does the
> buildroot override existence still make sense? Is there any use case
> that still requires BR overrides and cannot be done with side-tags?
> 
I use overrides pretty extensively when populating new EPEL. If you have
a deep dependency tree and the packages are scattered among many maintainers,
it's much faster to use an override than to block depending packages for
a week. Side tags also do not work there because every new package would reset
the testing period. And if I'm not mistaken non-proven packagers cannot edit
other's updates. And I don't count communication overhead. People would end up
mixing various side tags and crosstagging builds.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux