On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 7:54 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Clang doesn't understand some options that gcc does, and a lot of it depends on the version of clang IIRC. For a while Fedora maintainers would modify clang to at least silently ignore these options but now it's much easier to specify the toolchain you're using: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_compiler_macros Except, unfortunately, the el8 rpm macros don't seem to understand the toolchain specification. These are the days when I wish the documentation had something like a "available/introduced as of ..." annotation, so that one does not have to guess if the capability exists in a certain release. Yes, I understand these are fedora docs, and epel is not the primary target, but for those trying to support packages that build in both fedora and epel it would save some time (while there is an epel packaging section, it does not reliably include all the differences such as this one). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
