Re: Inactive provenpackagers to be removed from group

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 10:54 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 01:54:08PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:29 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > In accordance with FESCo policy[1], the following provenpackagers will
> > > be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of Koji builds
> > > submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you
> > > can reply off-list to indicate you should still be in the
> > > provenpackager group.
> > >
> > > Note that removal from this group is not a "punishment" or a lack of
> > > appreciation for the work you have done. The intent of the process is
> > > to ensure contributors with distro-wide package privileges are still
> > > active and responsive. This process is done regularly at the branch
> > > point in each release.
> > >
> > > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/#_maintaining_provenpackager_status
> > >
> > > Checked 148 provenpackagers
> > > The following 23 provenpackagers have not submitted a Koji build since
> > > at least 2021-08-04 00:00:00:
> > >
> > > akurtakov
> > > codeblock
> > > iarnell
> > > ilianaw
> > > jsmith
> > > jwilson
> > > kanarip
> > > karsten
> > > law
> > > laxathom
> > > lutter
> > > mcepl
> > > nhorman
> > > notting
> > > oliver
> > > pmachata
> > > psabata
> > > ruben
> > > steve
> > > tflink
> > > till
> > > tmraz
> > > wtogami
> >
> > So, has this actually happened? Checking a sample of these accounts
> > shows that all of them are still in the provenpackager group.
>
> yes, and I don't see the removed ones in provenpackager anymore.
> How are you checking?
>
> I removed the ones listed in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10576
>
> > I doubt that *everyone* on the list sent an off-list email to indicate
> > that they still need those privileges?
>
> Nope, a bit less than 1/2 of them it looks like.

Oh, I think I know what's going on. I looked at
src.fedoraproject.org/user/$user.
But those group memberships are only synced if the user logs in, AFAIK?
So ... do these packagers retain provenpackager capabilities in
dist-git so long as they never log in? :)

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux