Re: FESCo wants to know what you use i686 packages for

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 6:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:10:12AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:27:05PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > >> Native compilation on 32-bit is a dead end.
> > >
> > > And I was going to add that this is wrong - 32 bit chroots running on
> > > 64 bit hosts work fine and run at full speed.
> >
> > No, not for everyone, they don't.  Some Fedora packages need more than a
> > 32-bit address space to build, and that becomes more and more common.
>
> This is true, but what proportion of packages does this really affect?
> Also it's stuff like Firefox that we wouldn't want to compile for 32 bit
> anyway.

See my earlier comment about llvm and OpenGL.

- ajax
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux